Electrical power transmission networks are protected and controlled by high-voltage breakers. The definition of "high voltage" varies but in power transmission work is usually thought to be 72,500 V or over, according to a recent definition by the International Electrotechnical Commission. High-voltage breakers are nearly always solenoid-operated, with current sensing protective relays operated through current transformers. In substations the protection relay scheme can be complex, protecting equipment and busses from various types of overload or ground/earth fault.
High-voltage breakers are broadly classified by the medium used to extinguish the arc.
Oil-filled (dead tank and live tank)
Oil-filled, min oil volume
Air blast
Sulfur hexafluoride
High voltage breakers are routinely available up to 765 kV AC.
Live tank circuit breakers are where the enclosure that contains the breaking mechanism is at line potential, that is, "Live". Dead tank circuit breaker enclosures are at earth potential.
Current interruption in a high-voltage circuit-breaker is obtained by separating two contacts in a medium, such as sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), having excellent dielectrical and arc quenching properties. After contact separation, current is carried through an arc and is interrupted when this arc is cooled by a gas blast of sufficient intensity.
Gas blast applied on the arc must be able to cool it rapidly so that gas temperature between the contacts is reduced from 20,000 K to less than 2000 K in a few hundred microseconds, so that it is able to withstand the transient recovery voltage that is applied across the contacts after current interruption. Sulfur hexafluoride is generally used in present high-voltage circuit-breakers (of rated voltage higher than 52 kV).
In the 1980s and 1990s, the pressure necessary to blast the arc was generated mostly by gas heating using arc energy. It is now possible to use low energy spring-loaded mechanisms to drive high-voltage circuit-breakers up to 800 kV.
Brief history
The first industrial application of SF6 for current interruption dates back to 1953. High-voltage 15 kV to 161 kV load switches were developed with a breaking capacity of 600 A. The first high-voltage SF6 circuit-breaker built in 1956 by Westinghouse, could interrupt 5 kA under 115 kV, but it had 6 interrupting chambers in series per pole. In 1957, the puffer-type technique was introduced for SF6 circuit breakers where the relative movement of a piston and a cylinder linked to the moving part is used to generate the pressure rise necessary to blast the arc via a nozzle made of insulating material (figure 1). In this technique, the pressure rise is obtained mainly by gas compression. The first high-voltage SF6 circuit-breaker with a high short-circuit current capability was produced by Westinghouse in 1959. This dead tank circuit-breaker could interrupt 41.8 kA under 138 kV (10,000 MV·A) and 37.6 kA under 230 kV (15,000 MV·A). This performance were already significant, but the three chambers per pole and the high pressure source needed for the blast (1.35 MPa) was a constraint that had to be avoided in subsequent developments. The excellent properties of SF6 lead to the fast extension of this technique in the 1970s and to its use for the development of circuit breakers with high interrupting capability, up to 800 kV.
Several characteristics of SF6 circuit breakers can explain their success:
Simplicity of the interrupting chamber which does not need an auxiliary breaking chamber;
Autonomy provided by the puffer technique;
The possibility to obtain the highest performance, up to 63 kA, with a reduced number of interrupting chambers;
Short break time of 2 to 2.5 cycles;
High electrical endurance, allowing at least 25 years of operation without reconditioning;
Possible compact solutions when used for GIS or hybrid switchgear;
Integrated closing resistors or synchronised operations to reduce switching overvoltages;
Reliability and availability;
Low noise levels.
The reduction in the number of interrupting chambers per pole has led to a considerable simplification of circuit breakers as well as the number of parts and seals required. As a direct consequence, the reliability of circuit breakers improved, as verified later on by CIGRE surveys. Thermal blast chambers
New types of SF6 breaking chambers, which implement innovative interrupting principles, have been developed over the past more 15 years, with the objective of reducing the operating energy of the circuit-breaker. One aim of this evolution was to further increase the reliability by reducing the dynamic forces in the pole. Developments since 1996 have seen the use of the self-blast technique of interruption for SF6 interrupting chambers.
These developments have been facilitated by the progress made in digital simulations that were widely used to optimize the geometry of the interrupting chamber and the linkage between the poles and the mechanism.
This technique has proved to be very efficient and has been widely applied for high voltage circuit breakers up to 550 kV. It has allowed the development of new ranges of circuit breakers operated by low energy spring-operated mechanisms.
This technique, known as “self-blast” has now been used extensively since 1996 for the development of many types of interrupting chambers. The increased understanding of arc interruption obtained by digital simulations and validation through breaking tests, contribute to a higher reliability of these self-blast circuit breakers. In addition the reduction in operating energy, allowed by the self blast technique, leads to longer service life.
Double motion of contacts
An important decrease in operating energy can also be obtained by reducing the kinetic energy consumed during the tripping operation. One way is to displace the two arcing contacts in opposite directions so that the arc speed is half that of a conventional layout with a single mobile contact.
The thermal and self blast principles have enabled the use of low energy spring mechanisms for the operation of high voltage circuit breakers. They progressively replaced the puffer technique in the 1980s; first in 72.5 kV breakers, and then from 145 kV to 800 kV.Comparison of single motion and double motion techniques
The double motion technique halves the tripping speed of the moving part. In principle, the kinetic energy could be quartered if the total moving mass was not increased. However, as the total moving mass is increased, the practical reduction in kinetic energy is closer to 60%. The total tripping energy also includes the compression energy, which is almost the same for both techniques. Thus, the reduction of the total tripping energy is lower, about 30%, although the exact value depends on the application and the operating mechanism. Depending on the specific case, either the double motion or the single motion technique can be cheaper. Other considerations, such as rationalization of the circuit-breaker range, can also influence the cost.
Thermal blast chamber with arc-assisted opening
In this interruption principle arc energy is used, on the one hand to generate the blast by thermal expansion and, on the other hand, to accelerate the moving part of the circuit breaker when interrupting high currents. The overpressure produced by the arc energy downstream of the interruption zone is applied on an auxiliary piston linked with the moving part. The resulting force accelerates the moving part, thus increasing the energy available for tripping.
With this interrupting principle it is possible, during high-current interruptions, to increase by about 30% the tripping energy delivered by the operating mechanism and to maintain the opening speed independently of the current. It is obviously better suited to circuit-breakers with high breaking currents such as Generator circuit-breakers.
Generator circuit-breakers
Generator circuit-breakers are connected between a generator and the step-up voltage transformer. They are generally used at the outlet of high power generators (100 MVA to 1800 MVA) in order to protect them in a reliable, fast and economic manner. Such circuit breakers must be able to allow the passage of high permanent currents under continuous service (6.3 kA to 40 kA), and have a high breaking capacity (63 kA to 275 kA). They belong to the medium voltage range, but the TRV withstand capability required by ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.013 is such that the interrupting principles developed for the high-voltage range must be used. A particular embodiment of the thermal blast technique has been developed and applied to generator circuit-breakers. The self-blast technique described above is also widely used in SF6 generator circuit breakers, in which the contact system is driven by a low-energy, spring-operated mechanism. An example of such a device is shown in the figure below; this circuit breaker is rated for 17.5 kV and 63 kA.Evolution of tripping energy
The operating energy has been reduced by 5 to 7 times during this period of 27 years. This illustrates well the great progress made in this field of interrupting techniques for high-voltage circuit-breakers. Future perspectives
In the near future, present interrupting technologies can be applied to circuit-breakers with the higher rated breaking currents (63 kA to 80 kA) required in some networks with increasing power generation.
Self blast or thermal blast circuit breakers are nowadays accepted world wide[citation needed] and they have been in service for high voltage applications for about 15 years[citation needed], starting with the voltage level of 72.5 kV. Today this technique is also available for the voltage levels 420/550/800 kV.
5 comments:
Ρretty seсtiοn of content. I ϳust stumblеԁ upon yοur blog аnd
іn аccessiοn capіtal tо say thаt I get actually enjοyеd аccount youг blog рοstѕ.
Anу wаy Ӏ'll be subscribing on your feeds or even I fulfillment you access consistently fast.
my web page; Www.Magmanual.Nl
Eνeryone loves ωhat yοu guyѕ
tеnd to be up tοο. Such clever woгk
and covегage! Keep up the goοԁ worκs guys I've incorporated you guys to our blogroll.
Have a look at my webpage :: Www.calozgroup.org
For hottest infоrmatiоn you have to visіt wοrld-widе-web and on internet I found this web page aѕ a finest ѕitе for newest uρԁates.
my ωebsitе Http://Www2.Bmw-Klubas.lt/tiki-index.php?page=UserPagecharabigg
This blog was... hoω dο ӏ say it? Relevant!
! Finallу I've found something that helped me. Thanks!
My homepage - capacitor and resistor
You've made some good points there. I checked on the internet to learn more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this site.
my homepage; resistance of a resistor []
Post a Comment